For state ethics commissions
Audit the filings that need it.
Every committee in your state, scored on how well its filing ties out to its bank activity. Skip the ones that match.
The problem
Today, reviewing a filing means opening a PDF and trusting the numbers. There's no tooling that compares what the committee filed against what actually hit the bank. Material variance gets caught when someone reports it, not when it happens.
What's in the app today
Statewide inbox
Every committee, scored. Sort by risk, not by date.
Bank-to-filing drill-down
Matched bank transactions next to filing schedule lines. Unmatched on either side surfaced.
Materiality scoring
0 to 100, with a $100 floor. Small committees don't get chased for rounding.
Follow-up workflow
Audit notes per filing, committee response tracked in-app, closed when resolved.
Custody and privacy
The state never holds raw bank data. We hold it under committee consent. The commission sees the verdict, the summary, and the matched-line drill-down on filings the committee has authorized.
Red verdict with no consent for drill-down? Your existing subpoena authority is unchanged. The tool tells you where to look, not how to act.
Roadmap
- Direct AR portal ingestion of submitted filings
- Strawman and conduit pattern detection
- Prohibited source cross-check (corporate, foreign national, government contractor)
- Statistical anomaly detection (Benford, just-under-threshold clustering)
- Multi-state expansion
Talk to us
Piloting with one or two states ahead of the 2026 cycle, AR first. No signup form on purpose. The first step is a conversation about your current review workflow.